GARP vs Value Investing (Buffet v Lynch)

Stock investing boils down to one thing: buying pieces of businesses with the hope they’ll be worth more tomorrow than they are today. But how you pick those businesses is what separates legendary investors from the rest.

Two of the most talked-about strategies are:

Warren Buffett’s value investing—the gold standard for long-term, fundamentals-based stock picking.
GARP (Growth At a Reasonable Price)—a hybrid method that blends value and growth investing.

Let’s break them down.

Buffett’s Strategy: Classic Value Investing

Warren Buffett, following the principles of his mentor Benjamin Graham, seeks companies that are:

Undervalued relative to their intrinsic value.
Moated with strong, sustainable competitive advantages.
Simple and understandable businesses.
Cash-rich and produce predictable, long-term free cash flow.

Buffett also famously avoids hot trends and sticks to long-term bets.

Key metrics he focuses on:

Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio
Price-to-book (P/B) ratio
Return on equity (ROE)
Consistent earnings history
Free cash flow

GARP: Growth at a Reasonable Price

GARP investors want companies with:

Above-average growth prospects
At a reasonable valuation

This strategy was popularized by Peter Lynch of Fidelity’s Magellan Fund.

GARP metrics:

PEG ratio (Price/Earnings to Growth) under 1 is ideal
Forward P/E ratio
EPS growth rate (expected and historical)
Revenue growth trends

GARP avoids both overpriced high-growth stocks and deep value traps.

Pros and Cons

Factor	Buffett’s Value Strategy	GARP
Risk Profile	Lower volatility, safer picks	Moderate risk—growth assumptions must hold
Time Horizon	Long-term (often 10+ years)	Mid to long term
Stock Type	Mature, dividend-paying, large-cap	Growth-oriented, mid-to-large cap
Downside Protection	Strong due to margin of safety	Moderate, depends on valuation discipline
Upside Potential	More muted, slow compounding	Higher if growth is realized

Which Has Worked Better?

Let’s look at performance data.

Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

Annualized return (1965–2023): 19.8% vs. the S&P 500’s 9.9%
Overall gain: Over 3,800,000% vs. S&P’s ~31,000%
Key Picks: Coca-Cola, American Express, Apple

Peter Lynch’s Magellan Fund (1977–1990)

Annualized return: 29.2%
Outperformed 99.5% of all mutual funds during that time
Key Picks: Dunkin’ Donuts, Ford, Taco Bell (all GARP-friendly)

More recently, GARP investors look at companies like:

Alphabet (GOOGL): PEG around 1, strong earnings growth
Adobe (ADBE): Double-digit revenue growth with sustainable margins
Costco (COST): Consistent earnings, modest valuation relative to growth

But over multi-decade periods, Buffett’s strategy has outperformed almost every other investor—including many GARP adherents—largely due to his patience and ability to reinvest capital efficiently.

Stock Examples

Buffett’s Method:

Apple (AAPL) – Bought when trading at ~10x earnings in 2016. As of 2024, it’s returned over 600%.
Coca-Cola (KO) – Held since 1988; original stake has multiplied nearly 20x, plus decades of dividends.
Bank of America (BAC) – Bought after 2008 crash; netted billions in gains and consistent dividends.

GARP Picks:

Alphabet (GOOGL) – Traded at PEG < 1 in early 2010s; since then, returned over 700%.
TJX Companies (TJX) – Discount retail with consistent EPS growth, outperformed broader market.
Visa (V) – High EPS growth with stable business model, PEG around 1.2, strong returns.

Conclusion: Which Should You Follow?

If you want steady, long-term compounding with low volatility, Buffett’s method is hard to beat. It requires patience and discipline but has proven to outperform most other strategies.

If you want higher upside and can tolerate some risk, GARP offers a more aggressive approach without going full speculative growth.

Best move? Learn from both. Buffett himself has shifted toward GARP-esque stocks (Apple is a prime example). In modern markets, the hybrid approach may be the most practical—but with Buffett’s patience baked in.

Creator1